Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Queen-empress Vs. Tafaullah

Queen-empress vs Tafaullah

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Sep 12, 1885
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/857600

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Escape from lawful custody - Arrest under civil process, Escape from--Criminal liability of officer suffering escape--Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 223. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Queen-empress

Respondent

Tafaullah

Legal References

Reported In
(1885)ILR12Cal190

Excerpt

escape from lawful custody - arrest under civil process, escape from--criminal liability of officer suffering escape--penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 223. - tottenham and agnew, jj.1. we think that the sessions judge is light in considering the conviction to be illegal. section 223 of the penal code applies only to cases where the person, who is allowed to escape, is in custody for an offence, or has been committed to custody, and not to cases where such person has simply been arrested under civil process. we, therefore, set aside the conviction and order the fine, if paid, to be refunded.

Full Judgment

Tottenham and Agnew, JJ.

1. We think that the Sessions Judge is light in considering the conviction to be illegal. Section 223 of the Penal Code applies only to cases where the person, who is allowed to escape, is in custody for an offence, or has been committed to custody, and not to cases where such person has simply been arrested under civil process. We, therefore, set aside the conviction and order the fine, if paid, to be refunded.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial