Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ujir Sheikh Vs. Syed Ali Sheikh and ors.

Ujir Sheikh vs Syed Ali Sheikh and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided May 10, 1915
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/855673

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 423(d), 522 - Appellate Court, powers of, to make any order. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ujir Sheikh

Respondent

Syed Ali Sheikh and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
30Ind.Cas.159

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), sections 423(d), 522 - appellate court, powers of, to make any order. - 1. this was a rule calling upon the district magistrate and the opposite party to show cause why the order setting aside the order under section 522, criminal procedure code, should not itself be set aside. it has been argued that the appellate court had no jurisdiction under the code to set aside that order and, further, that on the merits the order ought not to have been set aside. so far as the question of jurisdiction is concerned, we think that the appellate court had power to set it aside under section 423(d), criminal procedure code, which authorises the appellate court in an appeal to make any incidental order. so far as the merits are concerned, it appears that, on the findings of the appellate court, the order under section 522, criminal procedure code, ought not to have been' allowed to stand, and that the appellate court was, therefore, right in setting it aside. this rule must be discharged.

Full Judgment

1. This was a Rule calling upon the District Magistrate and the opposite party to show cause why the order setting aside the order under Section 522, Criminal Procedure Code, should not itself be set aside. It has been argued that the Appellate Court had no jurisdiction under the Code to set aside that order and, further, that on the merits the order ought not to have been set aside. So far as the question of jurisdiction is concerned, we think that the Appellate Court had power to set it aside under Section 423(d), Criminal Procedure Code, which authorises the Appellate Court in an appeal to make any incidental order. So far as the merits are concerned, it appears that, on the findings of the Appellate Court, the order under Section 522, Criminal Procedure Code, ought not to have been' allowed to stand, and that the Appellate Court was, therefore, right in setting it aside. This Rule must be discharged.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial