Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bohanan Vs. Nebraska

Bohanan vs Nebraska

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-17-1887
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/85558

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
125 U.S. 692
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bohanan

Respondent

Nebraska

Excerpt

bohanan v. nebraska - 125 u.s. 692 (1887) u.s. supreme court bohanan v. nebraska, 125 u.s. 692 (1887) bohanan v. nebraska no. 501 submitted october 11, 1887 decided october 17, 1887 125 u.s. 692 error to the supreme court of the state of nebraska syllabus a person convicted of crime in the court below having sued out a writ of error which was docketed here, and having escaped from the jurisdiction of the court below, this court declines to hear the case, and orders it removed from the docket unless the plaintiff in error comes within the jurisdiction of the court below on or before the last day of this term. the case is stated in the opinion. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. it appearing that during the pendency of this writ, the plaintiff in error has escaped, and is not now within the control of the court below either actually, by being in custody, or constructively, by being out on bail, it is ordered that the submission of the cause be set aside and that unless the plaintiff in error is brought or comes within the jurisdiction and under the control of the court below on or before the last day of this term, the cause be thereafter left off the docket until directions to the contrary. smith v. united states, 94 u. s. 97 .

Full Judgment

Bohanan v. Nebraska - 125 U.S. 692 (1887)
U.S. Supreme Court Bohanan v. Nebraska, 125 U.S. 692 (1887)

Bohanan v. Nebraska

No. 501

Submitted October 11, 1887

Decided October 17, 1887

125 U.S. 692

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA

SYLLABUS

A person convicted of crime in the court below having sued out a writ of error which was docketed here, and having escaped from the jurisdiction of the court below, this Court declines to hear the case, and orders it removed from the docket unless the plaintiff in error comes within the jurisdiction of the court below on or before the last day of this term.

The case is stated in the opinion.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

It appearing that during the pendency of this writ, the plaintiff in error has escaped, and is not now within the control of the court below either actually, by being in custody, or constructively, by being out on bail, it is ordered that the submission of the cause be set aside and that unless the plaintiff in error is brought or comes within the jurisdiction and under the control of the court below on or before the last day of this term, the cause be thereafter left off the docket until directions to the contrary. Smith v. United States, 94 U. S. 97 .

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial