Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Janokey Nath Roy

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jul 15, 1877
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/855387

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Appeal - Presidency Magistrates' Act (IV of 1877), Section 41--Prosecution--Sanction of Judge--Jurisdiction of High Court. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Janokey Nath Roy

Legal References

Cases Referred
Peace of Calcutta v. The Oriental Gas Co.
Reported In
(1877)ILR2Cal466

Excerpt

appeal - presidency magistrates' act (iv of 1877), section 41--prosecution--sanction of judge--jurisdiction of high court. - richard garth, c.j.1. we are clearly of opinion that no appeal lies in this case, and that we ought not to grant leave to admit the appeal. leave granted by a judge to institute proceedings is not a 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 15 of the charter. if authority were wanted, the case of the justices of the peace of calcutta v. the oriental gas co. 8 b.l.r. 433 would be ample authority for our judgment. but apart from that, this leave given by the court is the creation of a late statute. it is a power which did not exist when the charter was passed. it is a power of a peculiar kind. the object is to check rash proceedings in criminal matters being taken. it gives power to take proceedings, which could not have been taken without leave. as the legislature has not thought fit to give an appeal from such an order, we think that this appeal should not be admitted.

Full Judgment

Richard Garth, C.J.

1. We are clearly of opinion that no appeal lies in this case, and that we ought not to grant leave to admit the appeal. Leave granted by a Judge to institute proceedings is not a 'judgment' within the meaning of Clause 15 of the Charter. If authority were wanted, the case of The Justices of the Peace of Calcutta v. The Oriental Gas Co. 8 B.L.R. 433 would be ample authority for our judgment. But apart from that, this leave given by the Court is the creation of a late Statute. It is a power which did not exist when the Charter was passed. It is a power of a peculiar kind. The object is to check rash proceedings in criminal matters being taken. It gives power to take proceedings, which could not have been taken without leave. As the Legislature has not thought fit to give an appeal from such an order, we think that this appeal should not be admitted.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial