Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jellicoe and ors. Vs. the British India Steam Navigation Co.

Jellicoe and ors. vs The British India Steam Navigation Co.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 22, 1884
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/855140

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Bill of Lading - Exemption from damage occasioned by neglect of Company's servants--Suit to recover goods destroyed. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jellicoe and ors.

Respondent

The British India Steam Navigation Co.

Legal References

Reported In
(1884)ILR10Cal489

Excerpt

bill of lading - exemption from damage occasioned by neglect of company's servants--suit to recover goods destroyed. - richard garth, c.j. and cunningham, j.1. the small cause court judge having found as a fact that the plaintiffs in this case accepted the terms of the bill of lading, we think that we cannot do otherwise than confirm his judgment.2. the defendants, of course, are not subject to the provisions of the carriers act; and they have a right to impose upon shippers any terms, however unreasonable, which the latter think proper to accept. they may thus free themselves from the consequences of their own negligence or default, however gross or wilful.3. so long as the law allows one class of carriers to insist upon contracts of this kind, and the public submit to have their goods carried upon such terms, courts of justice are quite powerless to protect them.

Full Judgment

Richard Garth, C.J. and Cunningham, J.

1. The Small Cause Court Judge having found as a fact that the plaintiffs in this case accepted the terms of the bill of lading, we think that we cannot do otherwise than confirm his judgment.

2. The defendants, of course, are not subject to the provisions of the Carriers Act; and they have a right to impose upon shippers any terms, however unreasonable, which the latter think proper to accept. They may thus free themselves from the consequences of their own negligence or default, however gross or wilful.

3. So long as the law allows one class of carriers to insist upon contracts of this kind, and the public submit to have their goods carried upon such terms, Courts of Justice are quite powerless to protect them.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial