Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Johnson Vs. Wilkins

Johnson vs Wilkins

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-11-1886
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/85458

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
116 U.S. 392
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Johnson

Respondent

Wilkins

Excerpt

johnson v. wilkins - 116 u.s. 392 (1886) u.s. supreme court johnson v. wilkins, 116 u.s. 392 (1886) johnson v. wilkins submitted january 4, 1886 decided january 11, 1886 116 u.s. 392 error to the circuit court of the united states for the northern district of florida syllabus the plaintiff in error having failed to show either from the record or by affidavits that the matter in dispute exceeds five thousand dollars, the court dismisses the writ for want of jurisdiction. the facts are stated in the opinion of the court. page 116 u. s. 393 mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. there is nothing in this record from which it can fairly be inferred that the value of the matter in dispute exceeds five thousand dollars. the suit was ejectment, begun in a state court and removed to the circuit court of the united states, for a lot in pensacola and the profits thereof since january 1, 1880, of the yearly value of five hundred dollars. the value of the lot is not stated in any of the pleadings, but in the petition for the removal of the suit it is put at "more than five hundred dollars." the recovery was of the lot and rent at fifteen dollars per month from january 1, 1880, until march 1, 1883, or five hundred and seventy dollars in all. if this rental is to be taken as an indication of the value of the property, it certainly must be less than our jurisdictional limit. as it rests on the plaintiffs in error to show our jurisdiction either from the record or by affidavits, and this has not been done, the writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Full Judgment

Johnson v. Wilkins - 116 U.S. 392 (1886)
U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. Wilkins, 116 U.S. 392 (1886)

Johnson v. Wilkins

Submitted January 4, 1886

Decided January 11, 1886

116 U.S. 392

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SYLLABUS

The plaintiff in error having failed to show either from the record or by affidavits that the matter in dispute exceeds five thousand dollars, the Court dismisses the writ for want of jurisdiction.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 116 U. S. 393

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

There is nothing in this record from which it can fairly be inferred that the value of the matter in dispute exceeds five thousand dollars. The suit was ejectment, begun in a state court and removed to the circuit court of the United States, for a lot in Pensacola and the profits thereof since January 1, 1880, of the yearly value of five hundred dollars. The value of the lot is not stated in any of the pleadings, but in the petition for the removal of the suit it is put at "more than five hundred dollars." The recovery was of the lot and rent at fifteen dollars per month from January 1, 1880, until March 1, 1883, or five hundred and seventy dollars in all. If this rental is to be taken as an indication of the value of the property, it certainly must be less than our jurisdictional limit. As it rests on the plaintiffs in error to show our jurisdiction either from the record or by affidavits, and this has not been done,

The writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial