Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Boardman Vs. Toffey

Boardman vs Toffey

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-15-1886
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/85392

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
117 U.S. 271
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Boardman

Respondent

Toffey

Excerpt

boardman v. toffey - 117 u.s. 271 (1886) u.s. supreme court boardman v. toffey, 117 u.s. 271 (1886) boardman v. toffey argued march 11, 1886 decided march 15, 1886 117 u.s. 271 error to the circuit court of the united states for the district of new jersey syllabus if the trial below is by the court without a jury, and the findings of facts are general, only such rulings of the court in the progress of the trial can be reviewed as are presented by a bill of exceptions. the case is stated in the opinion of the court. page 117 u. s. 272 mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. this judgment is affirmed. the trial was by the court without a jury, and there is no special finding of facts. the only questions presented by the bill of exceptions which we can consider are those which relate to the refusal of the court to allow certain interrogatories to be put to witnesses on the stand, and in these we find no error. the general finding prevents all inquiry by us into the special facts and conclusions of law on which that finding rests. norris v. jackson, 9 wall. 125; cooper v. omohundro, 19 wall. 69; martinton v. fairbanks, 112 u. s. 673 . affirmed.

Full Judgment

Boardman v. Toffey - 117 U.S. 271 (1886)
U.S. Supreme Court Boardman v. Toffey, 117 U.S. 271 (1886)

Boardman v. Toffey

Argued March 11, 1886

Decided March 15, 1886

117 U.S. 271

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SYLLABUS

If the trial below is by the court without a jury, and the findings of facts are general, only such rulings of the court in the progress of the trial can be reviewed as are presented by a bill of exceptions.

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 117 U. S. 272

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

This judgment is affirmed. The trial was by the court without a jury, and there is no special finding of facts. The only questions presented by the bill of exceptions which we can consider are those which relate to the refusal of the court to allow certain interrogatories to be put to witnesses on the stand, and in these we find no error. The general finding prevents all inquiry by us into the special facts and conclusions of law on which that finding rests. Norris v. Jackson, 9 Wall. 125; Cooper v. Omohundro, 19 Wall. 69; Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U. S. 673 .

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial