Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Monohur Mookerjee

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided May 17, 1880
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/853462

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Executor by Implication - Probate--Reference--High Court a Court of Concurrent Jurisdiction--Indian Succession Act (X of 1865), Section 185 and 264--Code of Civil Procedure Act X of 1877), Section 617. -

Key legal issue
Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Monohur Mookerjee

Legal References

Reported In
(1880)ILR5Cal756

Excerpt

executor by implication - probate--reference--high court a court of concurrent jurisdiction--indian succession act (x of 1865), section 185 and 264--code of civil procedure act x of 1877), section 617. - jackson, j.1. this reference was not properly made by the district judge. it is not a case in which section 617 authorised a reference to the high court, as the judge's order, if made, would not be final; but the learned advocate-general has asked the court to take his case up as a court of concurrent jurisdiction, and, under the circumstances, we have consented to do so. the point appears to us clear enough. the clauses of the will which have been read to us indicate, without doubt, that monohur mookerjee is a person--to use the words of wilde, j., in the goods of baylis (l.r., 1 p. & m., 21)--who was authorised 'to receive and pay the debts of the testator and to get in all the personal estate,' and he has been given full powers for that purpose to collect and receive all debts and manage the estate for the period of nine years, after the expiry of which he is to distribute it to the various legatees in the manner directed. we think he is entitled to probate.

Full Judgment

Jackson, J.

1. This reference was not properly made by the District Judge. It is not a case in which Section 617 authorised a reference to the High Court, as the Judge's order, if made, would not be final; but the learned Advocate-General has asked the Court to take his case up as a Court of concurrent jurisdiction, and, under the circumstances, we have consented to do so. The point appears to us clear enough. The clauses of the will which have been read to us indicate, without doubt, that Monohur Mookerjee is a person--to use the words of Wilde, J., In the goods of Baylis (L.R., 1 P. & M., 21)--who was authorised 'to receive and pay the debts of the testator and to get in all the personal estate,' and he has been given full powers for that purpose to collect and receive all debts and manage the estate for the period of nine years, after the expiry of which he is to distribute it to the various legatees in the manner directed. We think he is entitled to probate.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial