Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

AlimuddIn Howladar Vs. Emperor

AlimuddIn Howladar vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 05, 1902
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/853228

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Security for good behaviour from habitual offenders - Proceedings instituted By Magistrate on his own knowledge or suspicion--Transfer, right of accused to a--Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898) Sections 110, 117 and 191. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

AlimuddIn Howladar

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
(1902)ILR29Cal392

Excerpt

security for good behaviour from habitual offenders - proceedings instituted by magistrate on his own knowledge or suspicion--transfer, right of accused to a--criminal procedure code (act v of 1898) sections 110, 117 and 191. - prinsep and stephen, jj.1. this rule must be made absolute. although the law does not expressly provide for a case such as the present, which is under section 110, chapter viii of the criminal procedure code, in the same manner as section 191 declares the course to be taken when a magistrate has taken cognizance of an offence upon his own knowledge or suspicion, still the principle holds good that no man ought to be a judge in his own cause. in the proceeding in which action was taken under section 110 the magistrate records:whereas it appears from the report of babu kristo chandra chandra, sub-inspector, bhandaria, also from my knowledge of previous cases, that the above-mentioned persons have been habitually committing offences involving a breach of the peace, etc., and they are so desperate and dangerous as to render their being at large without security hazardous to the community, they are called upon to show cause why they should not be bound over for their good behaviour.2. the magistrate therefore has proceeded in some measure, if not mainly, on his own knowledge of the character of the petitioner, and he was in our opinion therefore not a proper person to proceed with this trial by, to use the words of section 117, inquiring 'into the truth of the information upon which action has been taken.' the case therefore must be transferred to some other magistrate. we accordingly direct that the proceedings be transferred to the district magistrate to be dealt with by himself or to be transferred to some other competent magistrate in the district.

Full Judgment

Prinsep and Stephen, JJ.

1. This Rule must be made absolute. Although the law does not expressly provide for a case such as the present, which is under Section 110, Chapter VIII of the Criminal Procedure Code, in the same manner as Section 191 declares the course to be taken when a Magistrate has taken cognizance of an offence upon his own knowledge or suspicion, still the principle holds good that no man ought to be a judge in his own cause. In the proceeding in which action was taken under Section 110 the Magistrate records:

Whereas it appears from the report of Babu Kristo Chandra Chandra, Sub-Inspector, Bhandaria, also from my knowledge of previous cases, that the above-mentioned persons have been habitually committing offences involving a breach of the peace, etc., and they are so desperate and dangerous as to render their being at large without security hazardous to the community, they are called upon to show cause why they should not be bound over for their good behaviour.

2. The Magistrate therefore has proceeded in some measure, if not mainly, on his own knowledge of the character of the petitioner, and he was in our opinion therefore not a proper person to proceed with this trial by, to use the words of Section 117, inquiring 'into the truth of the information upon which action has been taken.' The case therefore must be transferred to some other Magistrate. We accordingly direct that the proceedings be transferred to the District Magistrate to be dealt with by himself or to be transferred to some other competent Magistrate in the district.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial