Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Empress Vs. Joy Hari Kor

The Empress vs Joy Hari Kor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided May 03, 1877
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/852827

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Lunatic - Security--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872) Section 426, 432--Jurisdiction of Criminal Courts. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Empress

Respondent

Joy Hari Kor

Legal References

Reported In
(1877)ILR2Cal356

Excerpt

lunatic - security--criminal procedure code (act x of 1872) section 426, 432--jurisdiction of criminal courts. - markby, j.1. we think that we ought not to make the order asked for, because, even if the case were transferred to the magistrate to dacca, we do not think he would have power to release the lunatic upon taking security. the authority of the magistrate appears to us to cease when the lunatic is handed over to the care of the local government, and it does not revive until the prisoner is sent back to the magistrate under section 432 on a certificate that he is capable of making his defence. the deputy commissioner can, if he thinks proper, bring the matter to the government.

Full Judgment

Markby, J.

1. We think that we ought not to make the order asked for, because, even if the case were transferred to the Magistrate to Dacca, we do not think he would have power to release the lunatic upon taking security. The authority of the Magistrate appears to us to cease when the lunatic is handed over to the care of the local Government, and it does not revive until the prisoner is sent back to the Magistrate under Section 432 on a certificate that he is capable of making his defence. The Deputy Commissioner can, if he thinks proper, bring the matter to the Government.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial