Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Akam Sheikh and ors. Vs. Emperor

Akam Sheikh and ors. vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 07, 1946
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/852636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Akam Sheikh and ors.

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1947Cal35

Excerpt

- 1. this is an appeal against a conviction of 3 accused by a majority verdict of 3 to 2 of an offence under section 364, penal code. the accused have each been sentenced to 6 years' rigorous imprisonment. the case was tried by an assistant sessions judge. the prosecution case is that there had been enmity between the deceased kalu and the 3 accused and that the two parties had been working in their fields during the day time. after dark the 3 accused were found holding the deceased kalu captive and leading him away from his field forcibly. some cries were heard. kalu did not return home that night and on a search being organised his dead body was found the next morning a little to the north of his land under a heap of straw. obviously, the prosecution case must be that the 3 accused either themselves murdered the deceased kalu or abetted his murder and that the murder was committed in consequence of the abduction, an offence under section 302 or under section 302/109, penal code, the punishment for which in each case may be the capital sentence. the offences are triable only by a sessions judge. this jurisdiction cannot be avoided nor can jurisdiction be given to an assistant sessions judge by dealing with the case as one under section 364, penal code, as we have had frequent occasions to point out. section 364 is mainly a special case of enhanced punishment for a particular type of abetment of murder. the enhanced punishment will be applicable even though the murder is not committed in consequence of the abduction.2. the conviction and sentence are accordingly set aside and the case is remanded for retrial by the sessions judge of jessore or any other competent court to which he may transfer it. the accused should be tried under section 302 or under section 302/109, penal code as the trial court may think fit.

Full Judgment

1. This is an appeal against a conviction of 3 accused by a majority verdict of 3 to 2 of an offence under Section 364, Penal Code. The accused have each been sentenced to 6 years' rigorous imprisonment. The case was tried by an Assistant Sessions Judge. The prosecution case is that there had been enmity between the deceased Kalu and the 3 accused and that the two parties had been working in their fields during the day time. After dark the 3 accused were found holding the deceased Kalu captive and leading him away from his field forcibly. Some cries were heard. Kalu did not return home that night and on a search being organised his dead body was found the next morning a little to the north of his land under a heap of straw. Obviously, the prosecution case must be that the 3 accused either themselves murdered the deceased Kalu or abetted his murder and that the murder was committed in consequence of the abduction, an offence under Section 302 or under Section 302/109, Penal Code, the punishment for which in each case may be the capital sentence. The offences are triable only by a Sessions Judge. This jurisdiction cannot be avoided nor can jurisdiction be given to an Assistant Sessions Judge by dealing with the case as one under Section 364, Penal Code, as we have had frequent occasions to point out. Section 364 is mainly a special case of enhanced punishment for a particular type of abetment of murder. The enhanced punishment will be applicable even though the murder is not committed in consequence of the abduction.

2. The conviction and sentence are accordingly set aside and the case is remanded for retrial by the Sessions Judge of Jessore or any other competent Court to which he may transfer it. The accused should be tried under Section 302 or under Section 302/109, Penal Code as the trial Court may think fit.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial