Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Empress Vs. in the Matter of the Petition of Jamoona

The Empress vs In the Matter of the Petition of Jamoona

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jan 22, 1881
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/852195

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 211 - Making false charge to Court or Officer having no jurisdiction. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Empress

Respondent

In the Matter of the Petition of Jamoona

Legal References

Reported In
(1881)ILR6Cal620

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 211 - making false charge to court or officer having no jurisdiction. - mitter, j.1. this case came before one of the judges of the present bench in the vacation, and it occurred to him that no charge was made to any one competent to act upon it. enquiries were, therefore, made as to the powers (magisterial or police) of the station staff officer.2. from the papers within it will be seen that he has no such powers.3. the appellant appeared before captain simpson, adjutant, 11th m. n. i., and station staff officer, and charged a non-commissioned officer with rape. there was an enquiry, and the charge being found to be false by the military authorities, the commanding officer caused the appellant to be prosecuted before the criminal authorities under section 211. she was committed for trial, and convicted by the judicial commissioner under that section.4. we are of opinion that the appellant neither instituted, nor caused to be instituted, a criminal proceeding. she, no doubt, charged the non-commissioned officer with an offence; but the station staff officer having neither magisterial nor police powers, as we are informed, it seems to us that section 211 will not apply. we do not think it is unduly refining the words of the section to say that the false charge must be made to a court or to an officer who has powers to investigate and send up for trial.5. we, therefore, set aside the conviction, and direct the appellant's discharge.

Full Judgment

Mitter, J.

1. This case came before one of the Judges of the present Bench in the vacation, and it occurred to him that no charge was made to any one competent to act upon it. Enquiries were, therefore, made as to the powers (magisterial or police) of the Station Staff Officer.

2. From the papers within it will be seen that he has no such powers.

3. The appellant appeared before Captain Simpson, Adjutant, 11th M. N. I., and Station Staff Officer, and charged a non-commissioned officer with rape. There was an enquiry, and the charge being found to be false by the military authorities, the Commanding Officer caused the appellant to be prosecuted before the criminal authorities under Section 211. She was committed for trial, and convicted by the Judicial Commissioner under that section.

4. We are of opinion that the appellant neither instituted, nor caused to be instituted, a criminal proceeding. She, no doubt, charged the non-commissioned officer with an offence; but the Station Staff Officer having neither magisterial nor police powers, as we are informed, it seems to us that Section 211 will not apply. We do not think it is unduly refining the words of the section to say that the false charge must be made to a Court or to an officer who has powers to investigate and send up for trial.

5. We, therefore, set aside the conviction, and direct the appellant's discharge.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial