Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fussell Vs. Hughes

Fussell vs Hughes

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1885
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/85208

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
113 U.S. 565
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fussell

Respondent

Hughes

Excerpt

fussell v. hughes - 113 u.s. 565 (1885) u.s. supreme court fussell v. hughes, 113 u.s. 565 (1885) 113 u.s. 565 fussell v. hughes and others. [ footnote 1 ] february 2, 1885 the bill in this case was also filed november 20, 1879. it was based on the same alleged title as that in fussell v. gregg, ante, 631, and was page 113 u.s. 565, 566 brought for a part of the lands covered by the same entry and survey, and prayed for the same relief. the same defenses were pleaded. it follows, from what has been said in fussell v. gregg, supra, that this suit is not within the jurisdiction of a court of equity, and that the plaintiff has no right whatever to the lands to which she seeks to establish title, and of which she prays to be put in possession. the decree of the circuit court by which the bill was dismissed was therefore right. decree affirmed. footnotes footnote 1 s. c. 8 fed. rep. 384.

Full Judgment

FUSSELL v. HUGHES - 113 U.S. 565 (1885)
U.S. Supreme Court FUSSELL v. HUGHES, 113 U.S. 565 (1885)

113 U.S. 565

FUSSELL
v.
HUGHES and others. [ Footnote 1 ]

February 2, 1885

The bill in this case was also filed November 20, 1879. It was based on the same alleged title as that in Fussell v. Gregg, ante, 631, and was

Page 113 U.S. 565, 566

brought for a part of the lands covered by the same entry and survey, and prayed for the same relief. The same defenses were pleaded. It follows, from what has been said in Fussell v. Gregg, supra, that this suit is not within the jurisdiction of a court of equity, and that the plaintiff has no right whatever to the lands to which she seeks to establish title, and of which she prays to be put in possession. The decree of the circuit court by which the bill was dismissed was therefore right. Decree affirmed. Footnotes

Footnote 1 S. C. 8 Fed. Rep. 384.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial