Full Judgment
ORDER
1. We must decline to interfere. The accused has been convicted of an attempt, and the conviction therefore does not fall strictly within the terms of Section 75 of the Indian Penal Code.
Queen-empress Vs. Sricharan Bauri
Queen-empress vs Sricharan Bauri
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/852074
- Court
- Kolkata
- Judge
- W. Comer Petheram, C.J. and ;Cunningham, J.
- Decided On
- Mar 19, 1887
- Subject
- Criminal
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
Sentence - Penal Code, Act XLV of 1860, Sections 75, 179, 511--Attempt to commit an offence--Enhancement of sentence for previous conviction--Previous conviction. -
- Key legal issue
- Criminal
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
Queen-empress
Respondent
Sricharan Bauri
Legal References
- Reported In
- (1887)ILR14Cal357
Excerpt
sentence - penal code, act xlv of 1860, sections 75, 179, 511--attempt to commit an offence--enhancement of sentence for previous conviction--previous conviction. - order1. we must decline to interfere. the accused has been convicted of an attempt, and the conviction therefore does not fall strictly within the terms of section 75 of the indian penal code.