Kennelly Vs. Wyman

Kennelly vs Wyman

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 14, 1876

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/851427

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/851427
Court: Kolkata
Judge: Phear, J.
Decided On: Feb 14, 1876
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Practice - Inspection of Documents--Rules of High Court of 6th June 1874, 50, 52. -

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kennelly

Respondent

Wyman

Legal References

Cases Referred: De Gex J.S. v. Pitt L.R.
Reported In: (1876)ILR1Cal179

Excerpt

practice - inspection of documents--rules of high court of 6th june 1874, 50, 52. - phear, j.1. the court intimates it has considered the matter, and refers to wright v. pitt l.r. 3 ch. app. 809 and states it is clear the applicant connot cross-examine upon the affidavit but can only show that it is not an honest affidavit. the omitted document is sufficiently mentioned and described in the written inspection, if inspection is needed. summons dismissed. costs to be costs in the cause. the report of noel v. noel 9 jur. n.s. 589 : s.c. 1 de gex j.s. v. pitt l.r. 3 ch. app. 809.

Full Judgment

Phear, J.

1. The Court intimates it has considered the matter, and refers to Wright v. Pitt L.R. 3 Ch. App. 809 and states it is clear the applicant connot cross-examine upon the affidavit but can only show that it is not an honest affidavit. The omitted document is sufficiently mentioned and described in the written inspection, if inspection is needed. Summons dismissed. Costs to be costs in the cause. The report of Noel v. Noel 9 Jur. N.S. 589 : S.C. 1 De Gex J.S. v. Pitt L.R. 3 Ch. App. 809.

Same Parties Kennelly vs Wyman Same Subject Civil Same Judge Phear, J.

Civil