Skip to content


Kennelly Vs. Wyman - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Civil

Court

Kolkata

Decided On

Judge

Reported in

(1876)ILR1Cal179

Appellant

Kennelly

Respondent

Wyman

Cases Referred

De Gex J.S. v. Pitt L.R.

Excerpt:


practice - inspection of documents--rules of high court of 6th june 1874, 50, 52. - phear, j.1. the court intimates it has considered the matter, and refers to wright v. pitt l.r. 3 ch. app. 809 and states it is clear the applicant connot cross-examine upon the affidavit but can only show that it is not an honest affidavit. the omitted document is sufficiently mentioned and described in the written inspection, if inspection is needed. summons dismissed. costs to be costs in the cause. the report of noel v. noel 9 jur. n.s. 589 : s.c. 1 de gex j.s. v. pitt l.r. 3 ch. app. 809.

Judgment:


Phear, J.

1. The Court intimates it has considered the matter, and refers to Wright v. Pitt L.R. 3 Ch. App. 809 and states it is clear the applicant connot cross-examine upon the affidavit but can only show that it is not an honest affidavit. The omitted document is sufficiently mentioned and described in the written inspection, if inspection is needed. Summons dismissed. Costs to be costs in the cause. The report of Noel v. Noel 9 Jur. N.S. 589 : S.C. 1 De Gex J.S. v. Pitt L.R. 3 Ch. App. 809.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //