Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nando Lal Vs. Chutterput Sing

Nando Lal vs Chutterput Sing

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 15, 1902
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/851078

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Decree, transmission of - Execution--Assignee of Decree--Notice--Civil Procedure Code (Act XIV of 1882) Section 232. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nando Lal

Respondent

Chutterput Sing

Legal References

Reported In
(1902)ILR29Cal235

Excerpt

decree, transmission of - execution--assignee of decree--notice--civil procedure code (act xiv of 1882) section 232. - sale, j.1. it has been the practice of this court to consider applications to transmit decrees, not applications for execution, and there is no section which says that on an application to transmit for the purpose of execution in another court, notice must go. it is only when an application is made for execution.2. but the only section under which an assignee can come in, is under section 232 of the code, and that section only provides for an application to the court which passed the decree. there is no section under which an assignee can apply to transmit for execution to another court. as the code now stands, i submit, the assignee must come to the court which passed the decree. at any rate, rather than run the risk of the judgment-debtor raising this point and incurring costs in the mofussil courts, i ask in the first place for a notice to issue under section 232 of the civil procedure code.sale, j.3. very well, let this be treated as an application for execution under section 232 of the civil procedure code, and let notice issue under that section to the assignee and the judgment-debtor.

Full Judgment

Sale, J.

1. It has been the practice of this Court to consider applications to transmit decrees, not applications for execution, and there is no section which says that on an application to transmit for the purpose of execution in another Court, notice must go. It is only when an application is made for execution.

2. But the only section under which an assignee can come in, is under Section 232 of the Code, and that section only provides for an application to the Court which passed the decree. There is no section under which an assignee can apply to transmit for execution to another Court. As the Code now stands, I submit, the assignee must come to the Court which passed the decree. At any rate, rather than run the risk of the judgment-debtor raising this point and incurring costs in the mofussil Courts, I ask in the first place for a notice to issue under Section 232 of the Civil Procedure Code.

Sale, J.

3. Very well, let this be treated as an application for execution under Section 232 of the Civil Procedure Code, and let notice issue under that section to the assignee and the judgment-debtor.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial