Full Judgment
Sale, J.
1. My view is this, that, where there are two sets of defendants and their interests are practically the same, both should address the Court before any evidence is gone into.
In Re: Dukshina Mohun Roy
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/850954
- Court
- Kolkata
- Judge
- Sale, J.
- Decided On
- Jan 16, 1902
- Subject
- Civil
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
Practice - Suit--Plaintiff's case closed--Both defendants with same interests--Right of second defendant to open case before or after evidence has been gone into on behalf of first defendant. -
- Key legal issue
- Civil
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
In Re: Dukshina Mohun Roy
Legal References
- Reported In
- (1902)ILR29Cal32
Excerpt
practice - suit--plaintiff's case closed--both defendants with same interests--right of second defendant to open case before or after evidence has been gone into on behalf of first defendant. - sale, j.1. my view is this, that, where there are two sets of defendants and their interests are practically the same, both should address the court before any evidence is gone into.