Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dows Vs. Johnson

Dows vs Johnson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-21-1884
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84893

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
110 U.S. 223
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dows

Respondent

Johnson

Excerpt

dows v. johnson - 110 u.s. 223 (1884) u.s. supreme court dows v. johnson, 110 u.s. 223 (1884) dows v. johnson submitted january 7, 1884 decided january 21, 1884 110 u.s. 223 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the district of iowa syllabus when the value of the matter in dispute in this court is less than $5,000, the court is without jurisdiction of the cause, although an amount more than $5,000 may have been involved below. hilton v. dickinson, 108 u. s. 165 , approved and followed. motion to dismiss. case also submitted on the briefs. mr. justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. we have no jurisdiction in this case. the suit was brought by dows & co. to recover damages for the unlawful conversion of 10,000 bushels of corn, the value of which, according to the findings, did not exceed $6,000. with interest added to this sum from the date of the alleged conversion until the judgment, the most that could have been recovered, upon the special finding, was $6,360. a judgment was in fact rendered for $2,430. the matter in dispute in this court is the difference between these two sums, or only $3,930. in hilton v. dickinson, 108 u. s. 165 , it was settled that our jurisdiction depends on the value of the matter in dispute here, and as that in the present case is less than $5,000, it follows that the suit must be dismissed, and it is so ordered. dismissed.

Full Judgment

Dows v. Johnson - 110 U.S. 223 (1884)
U.S. Supreme Court Dows v. Johnson, 110 U.S. 223 (1884)

Dows v. Johnson

Submitted January 7, 1884

Decided January 21, 1884

110 U.S. 223

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA

SYLLABUS

When the value of the matter in dispute in this Court is less than $5,000, the Court is without jurisdiction of the cause, although an amount more than $5,000 may have been involved below. Hilton v. Dickinson, 108 U. S. 165 , approved and followed.

Motion to dismiss. Case also submitted on the briefs.

MR. JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

We have no jurisdiction in this case. The suit was brought by Dows & Co. to recover damages for the unlawful conversion of 10,000 bushels of corn, the value of which, according to the findings, did not exceed $6,000. With interest added to this sum from the date of the alleged conversion until the judgment, the most that could have been recovered, upon the special finding, was $6,360. A judgment was in fact rendered for $2,430. The matter in dispute in this Court is the difference between these two sums, or only $3,930. In Hilton v. Dickinson, 108 U. S. 165 , it was settled that our jurisdiction depends on the value of the matter in dispute here, and as that in the present case is less than $5,000, it follows that the suit must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial