Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ex Parte Clodomiro Cota

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-04-1884
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84860

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
110 U.S. 385
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ex Parte Clodomiro Cota

Excerpt

ex parte clodomiro cota - 110 u.s. 385 (1884) u.s. supreme court ex parte clodomiro cota, 110 u.s. 385 (1884) ex parte clodomiro cota submitted january 22, 1884 decided february 4, 1884 110 u.s. 385 on certificate of division of opinion from the district of california syllabus this court cannot take jurisdiction of a certificate of division in opinion in proceedings under writ of habeas corpus until entry of final judgment, ex parte tom tong, 108 u. s. 556 -- approved and followed. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. it was decided at the last term in ex parte tom tong, 108 u. s. 556 , that this court could not take jurisdiction of a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of a circuit court page 110 u. s. 386 in proceedings under a writ of habeas corpus until final judgment has been rendered in accordance with the opinion of the presiding justice or judge. this is such a case, and it is consequently remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings according to law.

Full Judgment

Ex Parte Clodomiro Cota - 110 U.S. 385 (1884)
U.S. Supreme Court Ex Parte Clodomiro Cota, 110 U.S. 385 (1884)

Ex Parte Clodomiro Cota

Submitted January 22, 1884

Decided February 4, 1884

110 U.S. 385

ON CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION OF OPINION

FROM THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLLABUS

This Court cannot take jurisdiction of a certificate of division in opinion in proceedings under writ of habeas corpus until entry of final judgment, Ex Parte Tom Tong, 108 U. S. 556 -- approved and followed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

It was decided at the last term in Ex Parte Tom Tong, 108 U. S. 556 , that this Court could not take jurisdiction of a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of a circuit court

Page 110 U. S. 386

in proceedings under a writ of habeas corpus until final judgment has been rendered in accordance with the opinion of the presiding justice or judge. This is such a case, and it is consequently remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings according to law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial