Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ex Parte Hung Hang

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-07-1883
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84495

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
108 U.S. 552
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ex Parte Hung Hang

Excerpt

ex parte hung hang - 108 u.s. 552 (1883) u.s. supreme court ex parte hung hang, 108 u.s. 552 (1883) ex parte hung hang decided may 7, 1883 108 u.s. 552 original syllabus except in cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, or consuls, or those in which a state is a party, the supreme court can only issue a writ of habeas corpus under its appellate jurisdiction. application for a writ of habeas corpus. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. this is an application for a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of an inquiry into the legality of the detention of the petitioner, hung hang, a subject of the emperor of china, by page 108 u. s. 553 the chief of police, under a warrant for his arrest, issued by the police judge of the city and county of san francisco, california, for a violation of an order or ordinance of the board of supervisors of such city and county, alleged to be in contravention of the constitution and of a treaty of the united states. it has long been settled that ordinarily this court cannot issue a writ of habeas corpus except under its appellate jurisdiction. ex parte bollman & swartwout, 4 cranch 75; ex parte watkins, 7 pet. 568; ex parte yerger, 8 wall. 85; ex parte lange, 18 wall. 163; ex parte parks, 93 u. s. 18 ; ex parte virginia, 100 u. s. 339 ; ex parte siebold, 100 u. s. 371 . section 751 of the revised statutes, which reenacts a similar provision in the judiciary act of 1789 (sec. 14), gives this court authority to issue the writ, but, except in cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, or consuls, and those in which a state is a party, it can only be done for a review of the judicial decision of some inferior officer or court. this petition presents no such case. the writ is consequently denied.

Full Judgment

Ex Parte Hung Hang - 108 U.S. 552 (1883)
U.S. Supreme Court Ex Parte Hung Hang, 108 U.S. 552 (1883)

Ex Parte Hung Hang

Decided May 7, 1883

108 U.S. 552

ORIGINAL

SYLLABUS

Except in cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, or consuls, or those in which a state is a party, the Supreme Court can only issue a writ of habeas corpus under its appellate jurisdiction.

Application for a writ of habeas corpus.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of an inquiry into the legality of the detention of the petitioner, Hung Hang, a subject of the Emperor of China, by

Page 108 U. S. 553

the chief of police, under a warrant for his arrest, issued by the Police Judge of the City and County of San Francisco, California, for a violation of an order or ordinance of the board of supervisors of such city and county, alleged to be in contravention of the Constitution and of a treaty of the United States.

It has long been settled that ordinarily this Court cannot issue a writ of habeas corpus except under its appellate jurisdiction. Ex Parte Bollman & Swartwout, 4 Cranch 75; Ex Parte Watkins, 7 Pet. 568; Ex Parte Yerger, 8 Wall. 85; Ex Parte Lange, 18 Wall. 163; Ex Parte Parks, 93 U. S. 18 ; Ex Parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 339 ; Ex Parte Siebold, 100 U. S. 371 .

Section 751 of the Revised Statutes, which reenacts a similar provision in the Judiciary Act of 1789 (sec. 14), gives this Court authority to issue the writ, but, except in cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, or consuls, and those in which a state is a party, it can only be done for a review of the judicial decision of some inferior officer or court. This petition presents no such case.

The writ is consequently denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial