Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bonnifield Vs. Price

Bonnifield vs Price

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1882
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84397

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
154 U.S. 672
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bonnifield

Respondent

Price

Excerpt

bonnifield v. price - 154 u.s. 672 (1882) u.s. supreme court bonnifield v. price, 154 u.s. 672 (1882) 154 u.s. 672 bonnifield v. price. no. 230. march 27, 1882 mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. this is a writ of error to bring here for review a judgment of the supreme court of the territory of wyoming in a case where the trial was not by jury. it is therefore dismissed on the authority of hecht v. boughton (decided at the present term) 105 u.s. 235 . the appropriate remedy in this case, under the act of april 7, 1874 (supp. rev. st. c. 80, p. 12), was by appeal. but, if we could treat this writ of error as an appeal, the case is in no condition for examination here, because there is no such statement of facts in the record as the law requires. the bill of exceptions taken in the district court contains all the evidence, and, as the supreme court directed a judgment in favor of the defendant, it is clear that court passed on other questions than such as were presented on the rulings in the admission of evidence. under these circumstances, a statement of facts such as page 154 u.s. 672, 673 the statute requires isnecessary to enable us to re-examine the case. the writ is dismissed. john w. hammond, c. n. potter, and e. p. johnson, for plaintiff in error.

Full Judgment

BONNIFIELD v. PRICE - 154 U.S. 672 (1882)
U.S. Supreme Court BONNIFIELD v. PRICE, 154 U.S. 672 (1882)

154 U.S. 672

BONNIFIELD
v.
PRICE.
No. 230.

March 27, 1882

Mr. Chief Justice WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to bring here for review a judgment of the supreme court of the territory of Wyoming in a case where the trial was not by jury. It is therefore dismissed on the authority of Hecht v. Boughton (decided at the present term) 105 U.S. 235 . The appropriate remedy in this case, under the act of April 7, 1874 (Supp. Rev. St. c. 80, p. 12), was by appeal.

But, if we could treat this writ of error as an appeal, the case is in no condition for examination here, because there is no such statement of facts in the record as the law requires. The bill of exceptions taken in the district court contains all the evidence, and, as the supreme court directed a judgment in favor of the defendant, it is clear that court passed on other questions than such as were presented on the rulings in the admission of evidence. Under these circumstances, a statement of facts such as

Page 154 U.S. 672, 673

the statute requires isnecessary to enable us to re-examine the case.

The writ is dismissed.

John W. Hammond, C. N. Potter, and E. P. Johnson, for plaintiff in error.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial