Kumar Spirits Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Kumar Spirits Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc. vs State of A.P. and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Nov 18, 2008

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/843579

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/843579
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: Arijit Pasayat and;Mukundakam Sharma. JJ.
Decided On: Nov 18, 2008
Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 6693 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 7656 of 2007)
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil - Similar issues - Held, issues herein similar with those forming subject-matter of challenge in appeal arising out of another SLP (Said SLP) - Said SLP disposed of by separate order - Appeal disposed of on same terms as indicated in said SLP - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890 Section 300: [Arijit Pasayat & Mukundakam ...

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kumar Spirits Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc.

Advocate M.V.K. Moorthy,; A. Chandramohan and; T. Anamika, Advs

Respondent

State of A.P. and ors.

Advocate Anoop G. Choudhary, Sr. Adv., ; Manoj Saxena, ; Rajneesh Kr.

Court's Analysis

Prior History: From the final Judgment and Order dated 16.8.2004 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Special Appeal Nos. 34 and 35 of 1994 and TRC Nos. 37 to 41 of 1994

Excerpt

civil - similar issues - held, issues herein similar with those forming subject-matter of challenge in appeal arising out of another slp (said slp) - said slp disposed of by separate order - appeal disposed of on same terms as indicated in said slp - indian penal code, 1890 section 300: [arijit pasayat & mukundakam sharma, jj] murder - culpable homicide - distinction and scope of held, according to the rule laid down in virsa singh v state of punjab, (air 1958 sc 465), even if the intention of accused was limited to the infliction of a bodily injury sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature, and did not extend to the intention of causing death, the offence would be murder, illustration (c) appended to section 300 clearly bring out this point. arijit pasayat, j.1. leave granted.2. the issues in the present appeal are similar with those which form the subject matter of challenge in the appeal arising out of slp (c) 21538 of 2006. the appeal has been disposed of by a separate order today. the present appeal is also disposed of on the same terms as were indicated in the appeal relating to slp (c) 21538 of 2006.

Full Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The issues in the present appeal are similar with those which form the subject matter of challenge in the appeal arising out of SLP (C) 21538 of 2006. The appeal has been disposed of by a separate order today. The present appeal is also disposed of on the same terms as were indicated in the appeal relating to SLP (C) 21538 of 2006.

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2008 Same Parties Kumar Spirits Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc. vs State of A.P. and ors. Same Subject Civil Same Judge Arijit Pasayat and;Mukundakam Sharma. JJ.

Civil