Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Mar 31, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/842680

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Company Petition No. 58 of 2009
Subject
Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Company
Acts & sections
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 211, 211(3B), 349 and 391 to 394

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd.

Advocate K.G. Raghavan, Adv. for;Dua Associates

Respondent

Advocate B. Pramod, Central Government Counsel for Regional Director

Legal References

Acts
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 211, 211(3B), 349 and 391 to 394
Reported In
[2010]155CompCas463(Kar)

Excerpt

- order(i) the scheme of arrangement--annexure a proposed by the petitioner-company is hereby sanctioned subject to the modification as per the undertaking of the petitioner-company in their affidavits dated february 22, 2010 and february 25, 2010, with effect from today and the same is binding on the petitioner-company and its shareholders.(ii) the petitioner-company is directed to serve a copy of this order on the registrar of companies, state of karnataka, within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.(iii) registry is directed to draw up a decree in form no. 42.(iv) ordered accordingly.

Full Judgment

ORDER

(i) The scheme of arrangement--annexure A proposed by the petitioner-company is hereby sanctioned subject to the modification as per the undertaking of the petitioner-company in their affidavits dated February 22, 2010 and February 25, 2010, with effect from today and the same is binding on the petitioner-company and its shareholders.

(ii) The petitioner-company is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Registrar of Companies, State of Karnataka, within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

(iii) Registry is directed to draw up a decree in Form No. 42.

(iv) Ordered accordingly.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2010 Same Parties In Re: Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd. vs Same Subject Company Same Judge H.N. Nagamohan Das, J. Acts & Sections Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 211, 211(3B), 349 and 391 to 394
Company

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales