Murphy Vs. United States

Murphy vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1881

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84157

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/84157
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1881
Case Number: 104 U.S. 464
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murphy

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

.....from the court of claims syllabus a claim against the united states for damages which a contractor alleged he had sustained was, by the appropriate department, adjusted upon a basis to which he agreed. he accepted the sum allowed, and gave a receipt therefor in full. held that the acceptance of the sum is a bar to his suit for the same claim. murphy entered into a written contract with the united states for excavating a portion of the pit for a drydock, and was paid at the contract price for all the work which be performed. he subsequently presented to the navy department a claim for damages suffered by reason of certain alleged violations of the contract, and for extra work. the department adopted a basis of adjustment, to which he agreed, and there was paid to him a certain sum which, upon full information as to the principles upon which it was awarded, he accepted, and gave a receipt in full. he sometime thereafter brought suit in the court below for the same claim, adding, however, a further item, of which there was no proof. the court dismissed the petition, and he appealed. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. we are clearly of the opinion that the acceptance by the claimant, without objection, of the amount allowed by the secretary of the navy, in his adjustment of the account presented to him, was equivalent to a final settlement and compromise of all the items of the present claim included in that account. there is nothing in the findings of the court below to warrant a judgment in favor of the claimant upon the only item page 104 u. s. 465 included in the petition in this case which was not mentioned specifically in the account presented to the secretary of the navy and passed on by him in the adjustment he made. judgment affirmed.

Full Judgment

Murphy v. United States - 104 U.S. 464 (1881)
U.S. Supreme Court Murphy v. United States, 104 U.S. 464 (1881)

Murphy v. United States

104 U.S. 464

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS

SYLLABUS

A claim against the United States for damages which a contractor alleged he had sustained was, by the appropriate department, adjusted upon a basis to which he agreed. He accepted the sum allowed, and gave a receipt therefor in full. Held that the acceptance of the sum is a bar to his suit for the same claim.

Murphy entered into a written contract with the United States for excavating a portion of the pit for a drydock, and was paid at the contract price for all the work which be performed.

He subsequently presented to the Navy Department a claim for damages suffered by reason of certain alleged violations of the contract, and for extra work. The department adopted a basis of adjustment, to which he agreed, and there was paid to him a certain sum which, upon full information as to the principles upon which it was awarded, he accepted, and gave a receipt in full.

He sometime thereafter brought suit in the court below for the same claim, adding, however, a further item, of which there was no proof.

The court dismissed the petition, and he appealed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

We are clearly of the opinion that the acceptance by the claimant, without objection, of the amount allowed by the Secretary of the Navy, in his adjustment of the account presented to him, was equivalent to a final settlement and compromise of all the items of the present claim included in that account. There is nothing in the findings of the court below to warrant a judgment in favor of the claimant upon the only item

Page 104 U. S. 465

included in the petition in this case which was not mentioned specifically in the account presented to the Secretary of the Navy and passed on by him in the adjustment he made.

Judgment affirmed.

Same Parties Murphy vs United States Same Subject Land Acquisition