Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mccarthy Vs. Provost

Mccarthy vs Provost

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1880
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84042

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
103 U.S. 673
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mccarthy

Respondent

Provost

Excerpt

mccarthy v. provost - 103 u.s. 673 (1880) u.s. supreme court mccarthy v. provost, 103 u.s. 673 (1880) mccarthy v. provost 103 u.s. 673 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the district of louisiana syllabus in a suit for partition, the value of the undivided part in controversy, and not of the lands, determines the appellate jurisdiction of this court. appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the district of louisiana. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. we have no jurisdiction in this case. the suit was brought to recover one two hundred and fortieth part of certain lands, and for a partition so as to set off to the appellant in severalty that interest. it is averred in the bill that "the value of the property sought to be partitioned amounts to more than $5,000," but the matter in dispute on this appeal is only one two hundred and fortieth part of the whole property, as that is all the appellant claims. our jurisdiction therefore depends on the value of that part, which certainly is not shown to be more than $5,000. appeal dismissed.

Full Judgment

McCarthy v. Provost - 103 U.S. 673 (1880)
U.S. Supreme Court McCarthy v. Provost, 103 U.S. 673 (1880)

McCarthy v. Provost

103 U.S. 673

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

SYLLABUS

In a suit for partition, the value of the undivided part in controversy, and not of the lands, determines the appellate jurisdiction of this Court.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

We have no jurisdiction in this case. The suit was brought to recover one two hundred and fortieth part of certain lands, and for a partition so as to set off to the appellant in severalty that interest. It is averred in the bill that "the value of the property sought to be partitioned amounts to more than $5,000," but the matter in dispute on this appeal is only one two hundred and fortieth part of the whole property, as that is all the appellant claims. Our jurisdiction therefore depends on the value of that part, which certainly is not shown to be more than $5,000.

Appeal dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial