Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Muller Vs. Dows

Muller vs Dows

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1876
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/83108

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
94 U.S. 277
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muller

Respondent

Dows

Excerpt

muller v. dows - 94 u.s. 277 (1876) u.s. supreme court muller v. dows, 94 u.s. 277 (1876) muller v. dows 94 u.s. 277 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the district of iowa syllabus stipulations between counsel relative to the course of proceeding in a cause pending in this court cannot be withdrawn by either party without the consent of the other except by leave of the court upon cause shown. page 94 u. s. 278 mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. stipulations between counsel relative to the course of proceeding in a cause pending in this court cannot be withdrawn by one party without the consent of the other except by leave of the court upon cause shown. the counsel in this case stipulated in writing, on or before july 5, 1876, to submit the cause on printed arguments, under rule 20, during the first ninety days of this term. this stipulation was filed here july 5, but, oct. 21, the counsel for the appellants notified the counsel for the appellees that he withdrew his agreement. the counsel for the appellees having filed a printed argument within the ninety days, now asks that the cause be taken up and considered by the court as submitted under the rule. this we might with propriety do, as, if the desired withdrawal is not assented to, application for the vacation of the stipulation ought to be made here in time to have it disposed of before the expiration of the ninety days. but as we have never before been called upon to settle the practice applicable to this class of cases, it is now ordered that the appellants cause a printed argument to be filed in their behalf on or before march 6 next or show good cause why the stipulation for submission made by their counsel should not be enforced against them, and in default that the cause be taken up and considered as submitted under the rule without argument by the appellants.

Full Judgment

Muller v. Dows - 94 U.S. 277 (1876)
U.S. Supreme Court Muller v. Dows, 94 U.S. 277 (1876)

Muller v. Dows

94 U.S. 277

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA

SYLLABUS

Stipulations between counsel relative to the course of proceeding in a cause pending in this Court cannot be withdrawn by either party without the consent of the other except by leave of the Court upon cause shown.

Page 94 U. S. 278

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Stipulations between counsel relative to the course of proceeding in a cause pending in this Court cannot be withdrawn by one party without the consent of the other except by leave of the court upon cause shown. The counsel in this case stipulated in writing, on or before July 5, 1876, to submit the cause on printed arguments, under Rule 20, during the first ninety days of this term. This stipulation was filed here July 5, but, Oct. 21, the counsel for the appellants notified the counsel for the appellees that he withdrew his agreement.

The counsel for the appellees having filed a printed argument within the ninety days, now asks that the cause be taken up and considered by the Court as submitted under the rule.

This we might with propriety do, as, if the desired withdrawal is not assented to, application for the vacation of the stipulation ought to be made here in time to have it disposed of before the expiration of the ninety days. But as we have never before been called upon to settle the practice applicable to this class of cases, it is now ordered that the appellants cause a printed argument to be filed in their behalf on or before March 6 next or show good cause why the stipulation for submission made by their counsel should not be enforced against them, and in default that the cause be taken up and considered as submitted under the rule without argument by the appellants.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial