Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kimball Vs. Evans

Kimball vs Evans

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1876
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/83023

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
93 U.S. 320
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kimball

Respondent

Evans

Excerpt

.....difficult and important questions, the cause was reserved, in accordance with the practice in ohio, to the supreme court "for its decision on said petition for the removal of the cause to the circuit court." the supreme court, after hearing, dismissed the petition and remanded the cause to the district court "for further proceedings according to law." to reverse this judgment the present writ of error was brought. page 93 u. s. 321 mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. it is clear we have no jurisdiction in this cause. the judgment of the supreme court is not the final judgment in the suit. it disposed finally of one of the questions involved in the suit, but not of the suit itself. the suit is still pending in the district court, and it is not impossible that the parties now complaining may be satisfied with the judgment which they may in the end be able to secure in the state courts. if not, after a final judgment has in fact been rendered by the highest court of the state in which a decision in the suit can be had, the case may be again brought here for a determination of the questions arising upon the petition for removal. but in the present condition of the record, the writ must be dismissed.

Full Judgment

Kimball v. Evans - 93 U.S. 320 (1876)
U.S. Supreme Court Kimball v. Evans, 93 U.S. 320 (1876)

Kimball v. Evans

93 U.S. 320

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF OHIO

SYLLABUS

Where a petition for the removal of a suit filed under the Act of March 2, 1867, 14 Stat. 558, was, in accordance with the practice of the state, reserved for the decision of the supreme court, and the latter dismissed the petition, and remanded the cause to the inferior court for further proceedings according to law, held that this Court has no jurisdiction.

Pending a suit in the District Court of Stark County, Ohio, a petition was filed under the Act of March 2, 1867, 14 Stat. 558, for its removal to the Circuit Court of the United states for the Northern District in that state. This petition presenting for consideration, in the opinion of the district court, difficult and important questions, the cause was reserved, in accordance with the practice in Ohio, to the supreme court "for its decision on said petition for the removal of the cause to the circuit court." The supreme court, after hearing, dismissed the petition and remanded the cause to the district court "for further proceedings according to law."

To reverse this judgment the present writ of error was brought.

Page 93 U. S. 321

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

It is clear we have no jurisdiction in this cause. The judgment of the supreme court is not the final judgment in the suit. It disposed finally of one of the questions involved in the suit, but not of the suit itself. The suit is still pending in the district court, and it is not impossible that the parties now complaining may be satisfied with the judgment which they may in the end be able to secure in the state courts. If not, after a final judgment has in fact been rendered by the highest court of the state in which a decision in the suit can be had, the case may be again brought here for a determination of the questions arising upon the petition for removal. But in the present condition of the record, the writ must be

Dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial