Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gaines Vs. Hale

Gaines vs Hale

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1876
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82976

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
93 U.S. 3
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gaines

Respondent

Hale

Excerpt

gaines v. hale - 93 u.s. 3 (1876) u.s. supreme court gaines v. hale, 93 u.s. 3 (1876) gaines v. hale 93 u.s. 3 error to the supreme court of the state of arkansas syllabus where, in a suit between some of the claimants to the hot springs in arkansas, the supreme court of that state by its decree refused aid to any of them against the other except as to the improvements erected by each respectively on the property, and as to them saved the rights of the united states, this court, having decided in hot springs cases, 92 u. s. 698 , that the united states is the owner of the property, affirms that decree. page 93 u. s. 4 mr. justice bradley delivered the opinion of the court. the decision made by this court in hot springs cases at the last term, 92 u. s. 698 , has disposed of the principal controversy between the parties in this case by declaring that neither of them is entitled to the land in question, and that the same belongs to the united states. as the decree of the supreme court of arkansas in the present case does not contravene this decision, but refuses aid to any of the parties against each other except as to the improvements erected by each respectively, and as to these saves the rights of the united states, we do not perceive any error in said decree on any federal question. decree affirmed.

Full Judgment

Gaines v. Hale - 93 U.S. 3 (1876)
U.S. Supreme Court Gaines v. Hale, 93 U.S. 3 (1876)

Gaines v. Hale

93 U.S. 3

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS

SYLLABUS

Where, in a suit between some of the claimants to the hot springs in Arkansas, the supreme court of that state by its decree refused aid to any of them against the other except as to the improvements erected by each respectively on the property, and as to them saved the rights of the United States, this Court, having decided in Hot Springs Cases, 92 U. S. 698 , that the United States is the owner of the property, affirms that decree.

Page 93 U. S. 4

MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

The decision made by this Court in Hot Springs Cases at the last term, 92 U. S. 698 , has disposed of the principal controversy between the parties in this case by declaring that neither of them is entitled to the land in question, and that the same belongs to the United States. As the decree of the Supreme Court of Arkansas in the present case does not contravene this decision, but refuses aid to any of the parties against each other except as to the improvements erected by each respectively, and as to these saves the rights of the United States, we do not perceive any error in said decree on any federal question.

Decree affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial