Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Crary Vs. Devlin

Crary vs Devlin

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-21-1876
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82970

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
154 U.S. 619
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Crary

Respondent

Devlin

Excerpt

crary v. devlin - 154 u.s. 619 (1876) u.s. supreme court crary v. devlin, 154 u.s. 619 (1876) crary v. devlin no. 527 submitted january 31, 1876 decided february 21, 1876 154 u.s. 619 error to the court of appeals of the state of new york syllabus dismissed on the authority of mining co. v. boggs, 3 wall. 304. the finding by a state court that the facts on which a party relies to bring his case within a statute of the united states do not exist is no decision against the validity of that statute. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. the motion to dismiss this cause is granted upon the authority of mining co. v. boggs, 3 wall. 304. there could have been no decision of the court of appeals against the validity of any statute of the united states, because it was found that the facts upon which the defendants below relied to bring their case within the statute in question did not exist. the judgment did not deny the validity of the statute, but the existence of the facts necessary to bring the case within its operation. dismissed.

Full Judgment

Crary v. Devlin - 154 U.S. 619 (1876)
U.S. Supreme Court Crary v. Devlin, 154 U.S. 619 (1876)

Crary v. Devlin

No. 527

Submitted January 31, 1876

Decided February 21, 1876

154 U.S. 619

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

SYLLABUS

Dismissed on the authority of Mining Co. v. Boggs, 3 Wall. 304.

The finding by a state court that the facts on which a party relies to bring his case within a statute of the United States do not exist is no decision against the validity of that statute.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

The motion to dismiss this cause is granted upon the authority of Mining Co. v. Boggs, 3 Wall. 304. There could have been no decision of the Court of Appeals against the validity of any statute of the United States, because it was found that the facts upon which the defendants below relied to bring their case within the statute in question did not exist. The judgment did not deny the validity of the statute, but the existence of the facts necessary to bring the case within its operation.

Dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial