Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Herhold Vs. Upton

Herhold vs Upton

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-04-1876
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82969

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
154 U.S. 624
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Herhold

Respondent

Upton

Excerpt

herhold v. upton - 154 u.s. 624 (1876) u.s. supreme court herhold v. upton, 154 u.s. 624 (1876) herhold v. upton no. 125 submitted november 29, 1876 decided december 4, 1876 154 u.s. 624 error to the circuit court of the united states for the northern district of illinois syllabus upton v. tribilcock, 91 u. s. 45 ; sanger v. upton, 91 u. s. 56 , and webster v. upton, 91 u. s. 65 , followed. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. the principles decided in upton v. tribilcock, 91 u. s. 45 ; sanger v. upton, 91 u. s. 56 , and webster v. upton, 91 u. s. 65 , are conclusive of this case. the judgment of the circuit court is therefore affirmed upon the authority of those cases. if the stock held by herhold is part of the increased capital, he is estopped by his acceptance of the certificate from denying the regularity of the proceedings under which the increase was effected. if it is part of the original stock, his liability exists whether the increase was made or not. in either event, the testimony offered to show that he did not sign the assent to the increase of the capital stock, filed with the auditor of public accounts, was immaterial and properly excluded. affirmed.

Full Judgment

Herhold v. Upton - 154 U.S. 624 (1876)
U.S. Supreme Court Herhold v. Upton, 154 U.S. 624 (1876)

Herhold v. Upton

No. 125

Submitted November 29, 1876

Decided December 4, 1876

154 U.S. 624

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SYLLABUS

Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U. S. 45 ; Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. S. 56 , and Webster v. Upton, 91 U. S. 65 , followed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

The principles decided in Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U. S. 45 ; Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. S. 56 , and Webster v. Upton, 91 U. S. 65 , are conclusive of this case. The judgment of the circuit court is therefore affirmed upon the authority of those cases. If the stock held by Herhold is part of the increased capital, he is estopped by his acceptance of the certificate from denying the regularity of the proceedings under which the increase was effected. If it is part of the original stock, his liability exists whether the increase was made or not. In either event, the testimony offered to show that he did not sign the assent to the increase of the capital stock, filed with the auditor of public accounts, was immaterial and properly excluded.

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial