Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Town of Ohio Vs. Marcy

Town of Ohio vs Marcy

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1873
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82464

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
85 U.S. 552
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Town of Ohio

Respondent

Marcy

Excerpt

town of ohio v. marcy - 85 u.s. 552 (1873) u.s. supreme court town of ohio v. marcy, 85 u.s. 18 wall. 552 552 (1873) town of ohio v. marcy 85 u.s. (18 wall.) 552 error to the circuit for the northern district of illinois syllabus a judgment affirmed because there was no question of law which this court could consider in a case where a trial by jury was waived in writing and the case submitted to the court, where the finding of the court was general, where the bill of exceptions embodied all the testimony in the case, but where no exception was taken to the admission or rejection of testimony or to any ruling of the court on the trial, and where no question was raised in the case on the pleadings. marcy brought assumpsit in the court below against the town of ohio, in illinois, on the interest warrants of certain bonds which the said town had issued and which warrants it neglected to pay. the parties waived a jury in writing and submitted the case to the court. the finding of the court was general -- namely, "that upon the matters submitted, the court finds the issue for the plaintiff, and assesses his damages at the sum of $4,286.60." judgment was rendered for this sum. a bill of exceptions embodied all the testimony in the case, but no exception was taken to the admission or rejection of evidence or to any ruling of the court on the trial. the town brought the case here on error. no question was raised on the pleadings. mr. justice miller announced the judgment of the page 85 u. s. 553 court affirming the judgment below because, upon the case as above given, there was nothing in the record which raised any question of law which this court could consider.

Full Judgment

Town of Ohio v. Marcy - 85 U.S. 552 (1873)
U.S. Supreme Court Town of Ohio v. Marcy, 85 U.S. 18 Wall. 552 552 (1873)

Town of Ohio v. Marcy

85 U.S. (18 Wall.) 552

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SYLLABUS

A judgment affirmed because there was no question of law which this Court could consider in a case where a trial by jury was waived in writing and the case submitted to the court, where the finding of the court was general, where the bill of exceptions embodied all the testimony in the case, but where no exception was taken to the admission or rejection of testimony or to any ruling of the court on the trial, and where no question was raised in the case on the pleadings.

Marcy brought assumpsit in the court below against the Town of Ohio, in Illinois, on the interest warrants of certain bonds which the said town had issued and which warrants it neglected to pay. The parties waived a jury in writing and submitted the case to the court. The finding of the court was general -- namely, "That upon the matters submitted, the court finds the issue for the plaintiff, and assesses his damages at the sum of $4,286.60." Judgment was rendered for this sum.

A bill of exceptions embodied all the testimony in the case, but no exception was taken to the admission or rejection of evidence or to any ruling of the court on the trial. The town brought the case here on error. No question was raised on the pleadings.

MR. JUSTICE MILLER announced the judgment of the

Page 85 U. S. 553

Court affirming the judgment below because, upon the case as above given, there was nothing in the record which raised any question of law which this Court could consider.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial