Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

GermaIn Vs. Mason

Germain vs Mason

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1872
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82369

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
154 U.S. 587
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Germain

Respondent

Mason

Excerpt

germain v. mason - 154 u.s. 587 (1872) u.s. supreme court germain v. mason, 154 u.s. 587 (1872) 154 u.s. 587 germain v. mason et al. no. 290. april 22, 1872. page 154 u.s. 587, 588 a. m. woodfolk, f. a. dick, and george g. wright, for plaintiff in error. j. hubley ashton and nathaniel wilson, for defendants in error. mr. chief justice chase delivered the opinion of the court. the writ of error in this case, as in the case of wells v. mcgregor ( decided at this term) 13 wall. 188, bears the test of the clerk of the supreme court of the territory of montana, and not the test of the chief justice of this court. it must therefore be dismissed.

Full Judgment

GERMAIN v. MASON - 154 U.S. 587 (1872)
U.S. Supreme Court GERMAIN v. MASON, 154 U.S. 587 (1872)

154 U.S. 587

GERMAIN
v.
MASON et al.
No. 290.

April 22, 1872.

Page 154 U.S. 587, 588

A. M. Woodfolk, F. A. Dick, and George G. Wright, for plaintiff in error.

J. Hubley Ashton and Nathaniel Wilson, for defendants in error.

Mr. Chief Justice CHASE delivered the opinion of the court.

The writ of error in this case, as in the case of Wells v. McGregor ( decided at this term) 13 Wall. 188, bears the test of the clerk of the supreme court of the territory of Montana, and not the test of the chief justice of this court.

It must therefore be dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial