Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Crilley Vs. Burrows

Crilley vs Burrows

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1872
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82356

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
84 U.S. 167
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Crilley

Respondent

Burrows

Excerpt

crilley v. burrows - 84 u.s. 167 (1872) u.s. supreme court crilley v. burrows, 84 u.s. 167 (1872) 84 u.s. 167 (wall.) crilley v. burrows december term, 1872 at the same time with the preceding was adjudged another, crilley v. burrows, which the court said (mr. justice davis delivering the opinion) was 'in no essential respect different from it;' and had 'no principle which had not already been passed upon by this court in some one of the suits relating to this protracted litigation.' on this account it is no further reported.

Full Judgment

CRILLEY v. BURROWS - 84 U.S. 167 (1872)
U.S. Supreme Court CRILLEY v. BURROWS, 84 U.S. 167 (1872)

84 U.S. 167 (Wall.)

CRILLEY
v.
BURROWS

December Term, 1872

At the same time with the preceding was adjudged another, Crilley v. Burrows, which the court said (Mr. Justice DAVIS delivering the opinion) was 'in no essential respect different from it;' and had 'no principle which had not already been passed upon by this court in some one of the suits relating to this protracted litigation.' On this account it is no further reported.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial