Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

City of Charleston Vs. Branch

City of Charleston vs Branch

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1872
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82254

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
82 U.S. 470
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

City of Charleston

Respondent

Branch

Excerpt

city of charleston v. branch - 82 u.s. 470 (1872) u.s. supreme court city of charleston v. branch, 82 u.s. 470 (1872) 82 u.s. 470 (wall.) city of charleston v. branch. december term, 1872 in which case branch had filed a bill against the councils of the said city and against the same south carolina railroad company, to prevent the former from collecting and the latter from page 82 u.s. 470, 471 paying a tax, levied by the city on the station-house of the railroad, and the property appurtenant to it in the said city. the principles involved were the same as in the last case, and the court below granted the injunction, thus holding the property free from taxation. the city appealed. after argument by the same counsel as in the former case, the opinion of the court was delivered by mr. justice bradley: the principles laid down in the preceding case must be applied to this. all parts of the road and property formerly belonging to the south carolina canal and railroad company, and all appendages and appurtenances thereof, are liable to taxation; whilst all property acquired by the south carolina railroad company directly under its own charter, and for purposes connected with its original road, is exempt from taxation. prim a facie the railroad terminus and depot in charleston, and the property accessory thereto, belong to the south carolina canal and railroad company portion of the joint property. but if it can be fairly shown that any of the company's property in charleston, claimed to be taxable, was acquired by the south carolina railroad company for the accommodation of the business belonging to its original roads, or for the joint accommodation of the entire system of roads under its control, such property will, pro tanto, and in fair proportion, be exempt from taxation. decree reversed, and the record remitted to the circuit court with directions to proceed in conformity with this opinion.

Full Judgment

CITY OF CHARLESTON v. BRANCH - 82 U.S. 470 (1872)
U.S. Supreme Court CITY OF CHARLESTON v. BRANCH, 82 U.S. 470 (1872)

82 U.S. 470 (Wall.)

CITY OF CHARLESTON
v.
BRANCH.

December Term, 1872

in which case Branch had filed a bill against the councils of the said city and against the same South Carolina Railroad Company, to prevent the former from collecting and the latter from

Page 82 U.S. 470, 471

paying a tax, levied by the city on the station-house of the railroad, and the property appurtenant to it in the said city. The principles involved were the same as in the last case, and the court below granted the injunction, thus holding the property free from taxation. The city appealed.

After argument by the same counsel as in the former case, the opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice BRADLEY:

The principles laid down in the preceding case must be applied to this. All parts of the road and property formerly belonging to the South Carolina Canal and Railroad Company, and all appendages and appurtenances thereof, are liable to taxation; whilst all property acquired by the South Carolina Railroad Company directly under its own charter, and for purposes connected with its original road, is exempt from taxation. Prim a facie the railroad terminus and depot in Charleston, and the property accessory thereto, belong to the South Carolina Canal and Railroad Company portion of the joint property. But if it can be fairly shown that any of the company's property in Charleston, claimed to be taxable, was acquired by the South Carolina Railroad Company for the accommodation of the business belonging to its original roads, or for the joint accommodation of the entire system of roads under its control, such property will, pro tanto, and in fair proportion, be exempt from taxation.

DECREE REVERSED, and the record remitted to the Circuit Court with directions to proceed

IN CONFORMITY WITH THIS OPINION.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial