Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Holmes Vs. Sevier

Holmes vs Sevier

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-06-1872
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82195

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
154 U.S. 582
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Holmes

Respondent

Sevier

Excerpt

holmes v. sevier - 154 u.s. 582 (1872) u.s. supreme court holmes v. sevier, 154 u.s. 582 (1872) holmes v. sevier no. 31 argued and submitted november 8, 1871 decided may 6, 1872 154 u.s. 582 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the eastern district of arkansas syllabus the liability of the maker of a note given for the purchase of slaves before the civil war was not affected by their emancipation. the case is stated in the opinion. mr. justice swayne delivered the opinion of the court. this is an appeal in equity from the decree of the circuit court of the united states for the eastern district of arkansas. the bill was filed by the appellants to enforce the payment of the balance due upon a promissory note, bearing date on the 25th of december, 1856, made by john a. jordan, since deceased, to robert ryan, also since deceased, for ten thousand dollars, payable on the first of january, a.d. 1860, with interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from date until paid. the note page 154 u. s. 583 was secured by a mortgage, and is averred to have been given for the purchase money of slaves subsequently emancipated by the government of the united states. the defendants demurred to the bill. the demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed. the opinion of the court was confined to the effect of the emancipation of the slaves upon the validity of the note. the judgment proceeded upon that ground. the views of this court upon that subject were fully expressed in osborn v. nicholson, 13 wall. 654, recently decided at this term, and they are decisive of this case. in accordance with those views, the decree of the court below is reversed and the case will be remanded to the circuit court with directions to proceed in conformity to the opinion of this court. reversed.

Full Judgment

Holmes v. Sevier - 154 U.S. 582 (1872)
U.S. Supreme Court Holmes v. Sevier, 154 U.S. 582 (1872)

Holmes v. Sevier

No. 31

Argued and submitted November 8, 1871

Decided May 6, 1872

154 U.S. 582

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

SYLLABUS

The liability of the maker of a note given for the purchase of slaves before the civil war was not affected by their emancipation.

The case is stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal in equity from the decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

The bill was filed by the appellants to enforce the payment of the balance due upon a promissory note, bearing date on the 25th of December, 1856, made by John A. Jordan, since deceased, to Robert Ryan, also since deceased, for ten thousand dollars, payable on the first of January, A.D. 1860, with interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from date until paid. The note

Page 154 U. S. 583

was secured by a mortgage, and is averred to have been given for the purchase money of slaves subsequently emancipated by the government of the United States. The defendants demurred to the bill. The demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed. The opinion of the court was confined to the effect of the emancipation of the slaves upon the validity of the note. The judgment proceeded upon that ground. The views of this Court upon that subject were fully expressed in Osborn v. Nicholson, 13 Wall. 654, recently decided at this term, and they are decisive of this case.

In accordance with those views, the decree of the court below is reversed and the case will be remanded to the Circuit Court with directions to proceed in conformity to the opinion of this Court.

Reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial