Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re Rose Craker

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 14, 1927
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/820755

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, (Act V of 1898), Section 488 - Order of maintenance of wife in England--Magistrate in India, confirmation by, with variation as to rate--Date from which maintenance, is payable--Future maintenance. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re Rose Craker

Legal References

Reported In
108Ind.Cas.906

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, (act v of 1898), section 488 - order of maintenance of wife in england--magistrate in india, confirmation by, with variation as to rate--date from which maintenance, is payable--future maintenance. - orderdevadoss, j.1. this is a reference by the sessions judge of nellore with regard to an order made by the district magistrate of nellore confirming the order of maintenance made by the justices of the peace, ramsgate, kent, england. the justices of the peace made a provisional order for the maintenance of mrs. craker against her husband at the rate of 2 a week, and the district magistrate has varied the order by directing the husband to pay at the rate of 30 shillings a week. in making this order he has overlooked two things. one is that the maintenance is payable from the date of the order directing maintenance to be paid; i. e. from the 31st may, 1926. the justices of the peace made the order of maintenance on the ground that for some eight weeks previous to 31st may, 1926 the husband did not maintain the wife and the district magistrate has taken that period into consideration in directing the husband, mr. graker, to pay maintenance at the rate of 30 shillings a weak. this is wrong. the maintenance is payable only from the 31st may, 1925, at the rate of 30 shillings a week; and the second mistake made is in not directing the husband to pay future maintenance at the same rate. i, therefore, vary the order by directing the respondent to pay maintenance at the rate of 30 shillings a week from the 1st of june, 1926, and the amount paid by him will be credited towards the amount payable by him from that date.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Devadoss, J.

1. This is a reference by the Sessions Judge of Nellore with regard to an order made by the District Magistrate of Nellore confirming the order of maintenance made by the Justices of the Peace, Ramsgate, Kent, England. The Justices of the Peace made a provisional order for the maintenance of Mrs. Craker against her husband at the rate of 2 a week, and the District Magistrate has varied the order by directing the husband to pay at the rate of 30 shillings a week. In making this order he has overlooked two things. One is that the maintenance is payable from the date of the order directing maintenance to be paid; i. e. from the 31st May, 1926. The Justices of the Peace made the order of maintenance on the ground that for some eight weeks previous to 31st May, 1926 the husband did not maintain the wife and the District Magistrate has taken that period into consideration in directing the husband, Mr. Graker, to pay maintenance at the rate of 30 shillings a weak. This is wrong. The maintenance is payable only from the 31st May, 1925, at the rate of 30 shillings a week; and the second mistake made is in not directing the husband to pay future maintenance at the same rate. I, therefore, vary the order by directing the respondent to pay maintenance at the rate of 30 shillings a week from the 1st of June, 1926, and the amount paid by him will be credited towards the amount payable by him from that date.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial