Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Patapsco

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1870
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82032

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
79 U.S. 451
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Patapsco

Excerpt

the patapsco - 79 u.s. 451 (1870) u.s. supreme court the patapsco, 79 u.s. 12 wall. 451 451 (1870) the patapsco 79 u.s. (12 wall.) 451 motion to dismiss syllabus upon a decree in the circuit court for a sum less than $2,000, "with interest from a date named," an appeal lies here under the statute which gives an appeal "where the sum in dispute . . . exceeds $2,000," provided that the sum for which the decree is given and the interest added to it together exceed $2,000. boyce filed a libel in the district court for the southern district of new york against the steamer patapsco, claiming $1,724. that court dismissed the libel, but, on appeal, the circuit court reversed the decree and sent the case to a master, to report the amount due. the master, on the 15th july, 1868, reported $1,982. the circuit court confirmed the report, and on the 11th february, 1870, decreed in favor of the libellant for the amount reported, with interest from the date of the report. adding the one year, six months, and twenty-six days' interest to the amount given by the report the sum was $2,200 and upwards. page 79 u. s. 452 the chief justice: the decree of the circuit court was for the amount reported due the libellant on the 15th july, 1868, $1982, and interest from the date of the report. we think that interest to the date of the decree must be computed as a part of the sum for which the decree was rendered. the sum thus computed exceeds $2,000, and the motion must therefore be denied.

Full Judgment

The Patapsco - 79 U.S. 451 (1870)
U.S. Supreme Court The Patapsco, 79 U.S. 12 Wall. 451 451 (1870)

The Patapsco

79 U.S. (12 Wall.) 451

MOTION TO DISMISS

SYLLABUS

Upon a decree in the circuit court for a sum less than $2,000, "with interest from a date named," an appeal lies here under the statute which gives an appeal "where the sum in dispute . . . exceeds $2,000," provided that the sum for which the decree is given and the interest added to it together exceed $2,000.

Boyce filed a libel in the District Court for the Southern District of New York against the steamer Patapsco, claiming $1,724. That court dismissed the libel, but, on appeal, the circuit court reversed the decree and sent the case to a master, to report the amount due. The master, on the 15th July, 1868, reported $1,982. The circuit court confirmed the report, and on the 11th February, 1870, decreed in favor of the libellant for the amount reported, with interest from the date of the report. Adding the one year, six months, and twenty-six days' interest to the amount given by the report the sum was $2,200 and upwards.

Page 79 U. S. 452

THE CHIEF JUSTICE:

The decree of the circuit court was for the amount reported due the libellant on the 15th July, 1868, $1982, and interest from the date of the report. We think that interest to the date of the decree must be computed as a part of the sum for which the decree was rendered. The sum thus computed exceeds $2,000, and the motion must therefore be

Denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial