Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: V. Desikachari and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 10, 1914
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/818100

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 107 - Security to keep the peace--Breach apprehended from opposite party if one party exercises his right, whether ground for demanding security. -

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: V. Desikachari and ors.

Legal References

Cases Referred
See Feroze Ali Mullick v. Emperor
Reported In
AIR1915Mad81; 25Ind.Cas.989

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 107 - security to keep the peace--breach apprehended from opposite party if one party exercises his right, whether ground for demanding security. - ordersadasiva aiyar, j.1. the members of the vedaparayanam party, to which the petitioners belong, have a prima facie right as worshippers to join in the recital of the prabandham (after the thodakkam is pronounced by the officeholder) and i see nothing substantial on the records which negatives that right.2. there is also no evidence worth the name that the petitioners are likely to commit a breach of the peace. that the opposite party is likely to commit acts of rowdyism if the petitioners' party insists on their rights, is no sufficient ground to call upon the petitioners to execute bonds to keep the peace under section 107 see feroze ali mullick v. emperor 7 cri.l.j. 504 : 12 c.w.n. 703 .i set aside the order of the learned sub-divisional magistrate so far as the petitioners are concerned.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Sadasiva Aiyar, J.

1. The members of the Vedaparayanam party, to which the petitioners belong, have a prima facie right as worshippers to join in the recital of the Prabandham (after the Thodakkam is pronounced by the officeholder) and I see nothing substantial on the records which negatives that right.

2. There is also no evidence worth the name that the petitioners are likely to commit a breach of the peace. That the opposite party is likely to commit acts of rowdyism if the petitioners' party insists on their rights, is no sufficient ground to call upon the petitioners to execute bonds to keep the peace under Section 107 See Feroze Ali Mullick v. Emperor 7 Cri.L.J. 504 : 12 C.W.N. 703 .I set aside the order of the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate so far as the petitioners are concerned.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial