Full Judgment
ORDER
Lakshmana Rao, J.
1. The plea of the petitioner was misunderstood and the conviction cannot be sustained. It is therefore set aside and there will be a retrial in accordance with law. The fine if levied will be refunded.
In Re: Pichumani Ayyar
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/817609
- Court
- Chennai
- Decided On
- Nov 21, 1940
- Subject
- civil
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
-
- Key legal issue
- civil
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
In Re: Pichumani Ayyar
Legal References
- Reported In
- AIR1942Mad281
Excerpt
- orderlakshmana rao, j.1. the plea of the petitioner was misunderstood and the conviction cannot be sustained. it is therefore set aside and there will be a retrial in accordance with law. the fine if levied will be refunded.