Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Thandra Narasimhappadu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 18, 1940
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/817465

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Thandra Narasimhappadu

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1942Mad275

Excerpt

- order1. the crop was raised by the petitioner and it was harvested by him before possession was restored to the opposite party. there was therefore no disobedience of the order prohibiting the petitioner from interfering with the possession of the opposite party and the conviction under section 188 (2), penal code, is unsustainable. the conviction and sentence of the petitioner are, therefore, set aside and his bail bonds will be cancelled.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. The crop was raised by the petitioner and it was harvested by him before possession was restored to the opposite party. There was therefore no disobedience of the order prohibiting the petitioner from interfering with the possession of the opposite party and the conviction under Section 188 (2), Penal Code, is unsustainable. The conviction and sentence of the petitioner are, therefore, set aside and his bail bonds will be cancelled.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: Thandra Narasimhappadu vs Same Subject criminal
criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales