Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Andi Vs. Emperor

Andi vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 25, 1910
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/816809

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Inquest report - Refusal to sign--No offence--Powers of Village Head--Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 174 and 175. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Andi

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
7Ind.Cas.557

Excerpt

inquest report - refusal to sign--no offence--powers of village head--criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), sections 174 and 175. - ordersankaran nair, j.1. i agree with the district magistrate that an inquest report is not a statement within the meaning of section 180 of the indian penal code and refusal to sign such a report is not an offence punishable under the penal code. he is also right in holding that village head acting under sections 174 and 175, criminal procedure code, has only the powers of a police officer specified in section 175. the conviction is accordingly set aside and the fine levied will be refunded.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Sankaran Nair, J.

1. I agree with the District Magistrate that an inquest report is not a statement within the meaning of Section 180 of the Indian Penal Code and refusal to sign such a report is not an offence punishable under the Penal Code. He is also right in holding that Village Head acting under Sections 174 and 175, Criminal Procedure Code, has only the powers of a Police officer specified in Section 175. The conviction is accordingly set aside and the fine levied will be refunded.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial