Full Judgment
ORDER
Lakshmana Rao, J.
1. The view of the District Magistrate is opposed to the language of Section 43, Madras Forest' Act, and the Public Prosecutor does not support the reference. The records will therefore be returned.
In Re: Ardhanari Iyer
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/815858
- Court
- Chennai
- Decided On
- Oct 15, 1940
- Subject
- civil
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
-
- Key legal issue
- civil
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
In Re: Ardhanari Iyer
Legal References
- Reported In
- AIR1941Mad835
Excerpt
- orderlakshmana rao, j.1. the view of the district magistrate is opposed to the language of section 43, madras forest' act, and the public prosecutor does not support the reference. the records will therefore be returned.