Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Ramakristnamma

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 14, 1910
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/815842

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 476 - Pencil Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 193--Prosecution, when can be ordered. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Ramakristnamma

Legal References

Cases Referred
Aiyakannu Pillai v. Emperor
Reported In
7Ind.Cas.398

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 476 - pencil code (act xlv of 1860), section 193--prosecution, when can be ordered. - order1. we must set aside the order on the ground that there is nothing to show that it was made in such circumstances that it can be said to have been a continuation of the proceedings in which the evidence was given [vide aiyakannu pillai v. emperor 32 m. 49 : 4 m.l.t. 404 : 19 m.l.j. 42 : 9 cri.l.j. 41 : 1 ind. cas. 597].

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. We must set aside the order on the ground that there is nothing to show that it was made in such circumstances that it can be said to have been a continuation of the proceedings in which the evidence was given [vide Aiyakannu Pillai v. Emperor 32 M. 49 : 4 M.L.T. 404 : 19 M.L.J. 42 : 9 Cri.L.J. 41 : 1 Ind. Cas. 597].

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: Ramakristnamma vs Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Miller and ;Munro, JJ.
Criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales