Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Reddy Venkayya

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 16, 1912
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/815790

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 197 - Lower Subordinate of Public, Works Department, charge against, of bribery--Whether sanction to prosecute necessary. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Reddy Venkayya

Legal References

Reported In
17Ind.Cas.402

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 197 - lower subordinate of public, works department, charge against, of bribery--whether sanction to prosecute necessary. - 1. the public prosecutor states that the accused is a sub-overseer of the public works department and belongs to the class of lower subordinates and under rules 54, 293 (s) and 423 of the rules of the public works department, 9th edition, he can be appointed or removed by the superintending engineer without reference to the local government. this being so, the deputy magistrate was wrong in refusing to entertain the complaint for want of sanction, under section 197 of the code of criminal procedure.2. we set aside his order and direct him to re-take the complaint on his file and deal with it according to law.

Full Judgment

1. The Public Prosecutor states that the accused is a Sub-Overseer of the Public Works Department and belongs to the class of lower Subordinates and under Rules 54, 293 (s) and 423 of the rules of the Public Works Department, 9th Edition, he can be appointed or removed by the Superintending Engineer without reference to the Local Government. This being so, the Deputy Magistrate was wrong in refusing to entertain the complaint for want of sanction, under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. We set aside his order and direct him to re-take the complaint on his file and deal with it according to law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial