Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: the Public Prosecutor

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 12, 1910
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/815737

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 224 - Escape from custody--Arrest of judgment-debtor--Judgment-debtor allowed to go by decree-holder and, process-server. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: the Public Prosecutor

Legal References

Cases Referred
and Crown v. Ramasami Konan
Reported In
7Ind.Cas.392

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 224 - escape from custody--arrest of judgment-debtor--judgment-debtor allowed to go by decree-holder and, process-server. - order1. (on admission). i reject the appeal. if the decree-holder and the process-server agreed to let the accused go, there is no escape from custody. queen empress v. muppan 18 m. 401 and crown v. ramasami konan 18 m.l.j. 540 : 31 m. 271 : 8 cri.l.j. 200 are cases of arrest on a criminal charge and have no application.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. (On Admission). I reject the appeal. If the decree-holder and the process-server agreed to let the accused go, there is no escape from custody. Queen Empress v. Muppan 18 M. 401 and Crown v. Ramasami Konan 18 M.L.J. 540 : 31 M. 271 : 8 Cri.L.J. 200 are cases of arrest on a Criminal charge and have no application.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: the Public Prosecutor vs Same Subject Criminal
Criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales