Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: M. Kuttia Pillai

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 20, 1942
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/813616

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: M. Kuttia Pillai

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1942Mad445

Excerpt

- orderburn, j.1. the learned district munsif has not called upon the petitioner to pay any particular court-fee and the question of what is the proper court-fee is not in my opinion before me. if it were, i should be obliged to decline it, because the duty of fixing the court-fee is cast by law on the trial court and the trial court's decision is ordinarily final. the learned district munsif has however exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the plaintiff to add to his plaint certain prayers which the plaintiff does not want to add. the court has no power, so far as i am aware, to compel any party to pray for any particular relief. in this case the petitioner alleges that the decree and subsequent proceedings in execution of the decree in o.s. no. 23 of 1932 are null and void and not binding on him. but he does not ask the court to make any declaration to that effect, or to set them aside as void against him. the learned district munsif has ordered him to add a prayer for the cancellation of the decree. he does not wish to do so and i am not aware of any power in the court to compel him. the order of the lower court directing amendment of the prayer is accordingly cancelled. it remains for the lower court to determine, on the plaint as it is, what is the proper court-fee and to dispose of the plaint according to law. i make no order as to costs of this petition.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Burn, J.

1. The learned District Munsif has not called upon the petitioner to pay any particular court-fee and the question of what is the proper court-fee is not in my opinion before me. If it were, I should be obliged to decline it, because the duty of fixing the court-fee is cast by law on the trial Court and the trial Court's decision is ordinarily final. The learned District Munsif has however exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the plaintiff to add to his plaint certain prayers which the plaintiff does not want to add. The Court has no power, so far as I am aware, to compel any party to pray for any particular relief. In this case the petitioner alleges that the decree and subsequent proceedings in execution of the decree in O.S. No. 23 of 1932 are null and void and not binding on him. But he does not ask the Court to make any declaration to that effect, or to set them aside as void against him. The learned District Munsif has ordered him to add a prayer for the cancellation of the decree. He does not wish to do so and I am not aware of any power in the Court to compel him. The order of the lower Court directing amendment of the prayer is accordingly cancelled. It remains for the lower Court to determine, on the plaint as it is, what is the proper court-fee and to dispose of the plaint according to law. I make no order as to costs of this petition.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial