Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Perumal Konan and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 22, 1940
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/812949

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Perumal Konan and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1941Mad71a

Excerpt

- orderlakshmana rao, j.1. the temples were broken into and the idols were removed for celebrating a festival and the taking was not dishonest. the conviction under sections 457 and 380, i.p.c., is therefore unsustainable but the petitioners would be guilty under section 147, i.p.c., as their common object was to enforce a right by means of criminal force, and violence was used in prosecution of the common object. the conviction under sections 457 and 380, i.p.c., is therefore set aside and the conviction under section 147, i.p.c., will stand. but the consequences were not serious and the case was taken up on a private complaint. under the circumstances the sentences already undergone are sufficient and the sentence of the petitioners under section 147, i.p.c., is reduced to the period already undergone.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The temples were broken into and the idols were removed for celebrating a festival and the taking was not dishonest. The conviction under Sections 457 and 380, I.P.C., is therefore unsustainable but the petitioners would be guilty under Section 147, I.P.C., as their common object was to enforce a right by means of criminal force, and violence was used in prosecution of the common object. The conviction under Sections 457 and 380, I.P.C., is therefore set aside and the conviction under Section 147, I.P.C., will stand. But the consequences were not serious and the case was taken up on a private complaint. Under the circumstances the sentences already undergone are sufficient and the sentence of the petitioners under Section 147, I.P.C., is reduced to the period already undergone.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial