Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ex Parte Dugan

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1864
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/81230

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
69 U.S. 134
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ex Parte Dugan

Excerpt

ex parte dugan - 69 u.s. 134 (1864) u.s. supreme court ex parte dugan, 69 u.s. 2 wall. 134 134 (1864) ex parte dugan 69 u.s. (2 wall.) 134 on petition for certiorari to the supreme court of the district of columbia syllabus on a mere petition for a certiorari, the court, according to its better and more regular practice, will decline to hear the case on its merits even though the counsel for the petitioner produce a copy of the record admitted on the other side to be a true one. it will wait for a return, in form, from the court below. on a petition for a certiorari to the supreme court of the district of columbia to send up the record of their proceedings upon a habeas corpus issued from that court upon the application of the petitioner, it was stated by mr. j. h. bradley, counsel of the petitioner, that a copy of the record had been obtained, and he asked this court, upon the admission of the attorney general that the copy was a correct one, to hear the case without a return from the court below. the attorney general, on the other hand, while admitting the copy of the record produced to be correct, moved the court, for reasons which he laid, to continue the case. by the court. we think it the better as well as the more regular practice to await the return of the court below before taking any action on the merits. the certiorari will therefore be now awarded. upon the coming in of the return, the case will be regularly before us, and the motion for continuance made by the attorney general will then be disposed of. action accordingly.

Full Judgment

Ex Parte Dugan - 69 U.S. 134 (1864)
U.S. Supreme Court Ex Parte Dugan, 69 U.S. 2 Wall. 134 134 (1864)

Ex Parte Dugan

69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 134

ON PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SYLLABUS

On a mere petition for a certiorari, the court, according to its better and more regular practice, will decline to hear the case on its merits even though the counsel for the petitioner produce a copy of the record admitted on the other side to be a true one. It will wait for a return, in form, from the court below.

On a petition for a certiorari to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to send up the record of their proceedings upon a habeas corpus issued from that court upon the application of the petitioner, it was stated by Mr. J. H. Bradley, counsel of the petitioner, that a copy of the record had been obtained, and he asked this Court, upon the admission of the Attorney General that the copy was a correct one, to hear the case without a return from the court below. The Attorney General, on the other hand, while admitting the copy of the record produced to be correct, moved the Court, for reasons which he laid, to continue the case.

BY THE COURT.

We think it the better as well as the more regular practice to await the return of the court below before taking any action on the merits. The certiorari will therefore be now awarded. Upon the coming in of the return, the case will be regularly before us, and the motion for continuance made by the Attorney General will then be disposed of.

Action accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial