Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: A. Venkataraghava Iyer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 16, 1941
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/811900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - 1. The petitioner has been convicted -and the conviction has been upheld in appeal-under Section 193, Local Boards Act, read with Section 207 and Schedule 7, for failure to obtain a license for storing and selling firewood during the year 1939-40 within the limits of the Panchayat Board of Uttaramerur and he h...

Key legal issue
criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: A. Venkataraghava Iyer

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1941Mad828

Excerpt

- - 1. the petitioner has been convicted -and the conviction has been upheld in appeal-under section 193, local boards act, read with section 207 and schedule 7, for failure to obtain a license for storing and selling firewood during the year 1939-40 within the limits of the panchayat board of uttaramerur and he has been fined hs.orderhorwill, j.1. the petitioner has been convicted - and the conviction has been upheld in appeal-under section 193, local boards act, read with section 207 and schedule 7, for failure to obtain a license for storing and selling firewood during the year 1939-40 within the limits of the panchayat board of uttaramerur and he has been fined hs. 5. schedule 7, local boards act, unlike schedule 6, city municipal act, does not require that a license should be taken out for storing firewood. it was unnecessary therefore for the petitioner to have taken out a license; and by not taking lout a license he committed no offence in storing firewood. whether he could sell firewood without a license may depend on whether by doing so he was exercising a trade. but this case did not turn on that. it was assumed that a license was necessary for storing firewood and both courts seem to have been under a misapprehension on that point. the conviction is therefore set aside and the fine refunded.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Horwill, J.

1. The petitioner has been convicted - and the conviction has been upheld in appeal-under Section 193, Local Boards Act, read with Section 207 and Schedule 7, for failure to obtain a license for storing and selling firewood during the year 1939-40 within the limits of the Panchayat Board of Uttaramerur and he has been fined Hs. 5. Schedule 7, Local Boards Act, unlike Schedule 6, City Municipal Act, does not require that a license should be taken out for storing firewood. It was unnecessary therefore for the petitioner to have taken out a license; and by not taking lout a license he committed no offence in storing firewood. Whether he could sell firewood without a license may depend on whether by doing so he was exercising a trade. But this case did not turn on that. It was assumed that a license was necessary for storing firewood and both Courts seem to have been under a misapprehension on that point. The conviction is therefore set aside and the fine refunded.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial