Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pandula Subbaya Vs. Pandula Ambamma

Pandula Subbaya vs Pandula Ambamma

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 12, 1909
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/810472

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 488 - Maintenance--Offer by husband to maintain his wife--Award of maintenance without considering wife's willingness or unwillingness to live with her husband--Illegality. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pandula Subbaya

Respondent

Pandula Ambamma

Legal References

Reported In
2Ind.Cas.155

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 488 - maintenance--offer by husband to maintain his wife--award of maintenance without considering wife's willingness or unwillingness to live with her husband--illegality. - ordermunro, j.1. the petitioner, in his statement, offered to maintain his wife and the magistrate should have asked the woman whether she was willing to live with the petitioner. if she refused, it was for the magistrate to consider the grounds of refusal and pass such order as he thought fit. the magistrate's order is set aside and he is directed to dispose of the case according to law.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Munro, J.

1. The petitioner, in his statement, offered to maintain his wife and the Magistrate should have asked the woman whether she was willing to live with the petitioner. If she refused, it was for the Magistrate to consider the grounds of refusal and pass such order as he thought fit. The Magistrate's order is set aside and he is directed to dispose of the case according to law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial